<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Hands, 2 Maniacs&#8230; How Do You Play This?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/</link>
	<description>My poker experiences, your mileage may vary.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: UK Poker Player</title>
		<link>http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-143271</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Poker Player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-143271</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure what to make of the hand - maybe just bad luck dude! With 3 premium pairs in a row and then the flop, I would have called it like you did. Keep putting up these articles, I like analyzing the play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what to make of the hand - maybe just bad luck dude! With 3 premium pairs in a row and then the flop, I would have called it like you did. Keep putting up these articles, I like analyzing the play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pligg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-143227</link>
		<dc:creator>pligg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-143227</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;5 Hands, 2 Maniacs… How Do You Play This?–Simon’s Poker Blog...&lt;/strong&gt;

Playing with maniacs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>5 Hands, 2 Maniacs… How Do You Play This?–Simon’s Poker Blog&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Playing with maniacs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-142586</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-142586</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments guys. 

Andrew - totally agree with your preflop advice, if you take another look at the hand you'll see the betting was capped preflop. Not unusual against these kinds of players and certainly the correct play with KK. Just got to get your money in with the best of it and hold on for the ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments guys. </p>
<p>Andrew - totally agree with your preflop advice, if you take another look at the hand you&#8217;ll see the betting was capped preflop. Not unusual against these kinds of players and certainly the correct play with KK. Just got to get your money in with the best of it and hold on for the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-142576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 06:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-142576</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon,

I liked the hand analysis with the exception of the last hand. I think you should have been 3-betting (and 4-betting all in if required) preflop with your kings. I think this would have pushed Crazyman out and the rest of the hand would have been what it is. You may not have won a big pot but most likely you would not have lost a big pot either. I think with the crazies (we have one at our weekly game) you have to be very very careful. Sure you can punish them, but when the hit (because you let them in cheap) and win you are kicking yourself for not reraising or raising more to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon,</p>
<p>I liked the hand analysis with the exception of the last hand. I think you should have been 3-betting (and 4-betting all in if required) preflop with your kings. I think this would have pushed Crazyman out and the rest of the hand would have been what it is. You may not have won a big pot but most likely you would not have lost a big pot either. I think with the crazies (we have one at our weekly game) you have to be very very careful. Sure you can punish them, but when the hit (because you let them in cheap) and win you are kicking yourself for not reraising or raising more to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryC</title>
		<link>http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-142361</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonspoker.com/2008/03/poker/5-hands-2-maniacs-how-do-you-play-this/#comment-142361</guid>
		<description>hey Simon,

I attribute those hands to bad luck mostly and don't play them altogether differently than you did.  Of course, I've been known to be called a donkey in some parts.

Thanks a bunch for the comment, bro, I do appreciate it.

G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Simon,</p>
<p>I attribute those hands to bad luck mostly and don&#8217;t play them altogether differently than you did.  Of course, I&#8217;ve been known to be called a donkey in some parts.</p>
<p>Thanks a bunch for the comment, bro, I do appreciate it.</p>
<p>G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
